Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started

The National-European Communitarian Party (NCP-PCN) Political Manifesto

The Original Version Can be found here

http://pcn-ncp.com/English.html

A brief introduction

The National European Communitarian Party was a pan European National Bolshevik party founded by Luc Michel in 1984 based in Belgium. The party is based largely on the ideas of Pan European Nationalist and Geo Political theorist Jean Francois Thiriart. Like Thiriart the party advocated for united Europe that would the Unified from Ireland all the way to Russia. The party was made up activist from both fascist and Marxist backgrounds abandon both labels and their dogmas for national communitarianism. Party also supported many third world nationalist leaders such as Saddam Hussein in Iraqi and Muammar Al-Gaddafi in Libya. The party website does not give an exact date on when the manifesto was written but it is safe to assume that it was probably written in the 1980s around the founding of the party. The Party has mostly been inactive since 2010 with there leader Michel has been more active in the Eurasian Observatory for Democracy and Elections. A Russian Non Government Organization that monitored the Crimean referendum in 2014. Michel has also written a few articles on National Bolshevism and on his friend/ mentor Jean Francios Thiriart. Along with trying organize both left and right wing activist in Europe with at one point support from Gaddafi to rebel against liberalism and American influence in the continent.

THE EUROPEAN MANIFESTO : EUROPE BACK TO THE EUROPEANS !

1. CIVILIZATION CRISIS AND THE COLLAPSE OF OUR SOCIETY

European countries remain attached to the greatness of a civilization which they believe still exits : there is however a gap between reality and its representation since the only crisis of civilization that we know is presently that of the European countries.
At the top, a wealthy ruling class which after 30 years in power is only capable of perpetuating illusions.

The regimist Europe was able to prolong its existence thanks to  its obedient submission to that corrupted ruling class. But this class has no freedom of action, it is only a hostage and a toy in the hands of the American super power. As things stand the ruling class naturally imposes myths and models alien to the European Mind particularly the so called “Consumer society” or more precisely the “Production Society”; a social organization “massified” to the extreme and in which popular community has been completely eliminated to the benefit of machines, money and crass consumerism.
Given that state of affair it is logical that our society  becomes more and more dehumanized, that our press no longer plays role and that nothing ever stands in the way of power and profit.

To remediate the present situation one must first discover the primary causes of the European Bankruptcy. This is important to give Europe the Moral, the ethics and the aesthetics which have been so much lacking to this day. The question is simple to put : we only have to be masters in our  land. Contrary to what imperialist ideology claims we say that the US have their own life which has nothing in common with that of Europe since our political and cultural heritage represents a fracture in the process of uniformization accomplished so far. Societies do not escape to historical significations or those that emerge by the analysis of reality. Freedom can only be guaranteed by force.
Europe must be in europan hands.

2. THE LIBERATION OF EUROPE : EUROPE BACK TO THE EUROPEANS !

Europe’s liberation implies a global withdrawal of the US. The end of American domination must intervene at the military level (disbandment of NATO) as well as at the economical level (nationalization of European based American companies and financial assets).

The liberation of Europe is the indispensable prelude to any attempt of European unification. There cannot be unification as long as Europe remains under the influence of the US. To be independent Europe must be liberated from the malevolent dominance of its American “ally”.

The unification of Europe will be possible if its revolves around several axis : mystic -The European Nation -, political – The European STATE – indispensable to exert power and force and  a state making device : a united political party with a genuine European dimension.

3. THE EUROPEAN NATION

At the end of this century we are witnessing the making of Big International Blocks, there no longer are small independent nations. This fact is the result of the law of “political physics”, it is a  question of DIMENSION. It is no longer possible to rely on France, Germany or Italy alone. If we aspire to freedom, we must be strong and to be strong we must build Europe. The EUROPEAN NATION or FUTURE NATION is radically opposed to “nostalgism” of ancient little  nations.
Therefore  we condemn :

  • Left and Right nationalism which divide Europe and are thus consciously or not anti European. Present national borders must cease to exist to allow the supranationalism to comfort political independence.
  • We reject micro-regional nationalism which are chimerical and noxious to the European cause. If we can understand the motivations of the Basque, Corsican movements we must also understand that the more Europe will be divided the weaker it will be and the weaker it will be the more it will remain under the dominance of “protectors” weather Americans or other.

We are however favorable to regionalist movements which are capable of getting integrated within the framework of the European Nation.

4. THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITARIANISM

Our EUROPEAN COMMUNITARIANISM is an aspiration to liberation in stark opposition with bellicose expansionism. It is the will of men who share a common destiny. The framework in which that  will can be expressed and achieved is Europe.

  • The EUROPEAN COMMUNITARIANISM in itself summarizes our originality, it is a political project socially global and total. Europeans want freedom for Europe, therefore its economical and political independence and a common justice. In order to reach those goals communitarianism integrates the socialist dimension.
  • Our EUROPEAN COMMUNITARIANISM is a PROGRESSISM since far from negating the rich cultural heritage of the various European nations it combines them in a constructive synergy to face the great socio-economical mutations of this ending century.


Such is the project that we must seek to propagate throughout Europe. That project would be vain without the political will to build a European STATE and a European SOCIALISM.

5. THE EUROPEAN STATE AND THE EUROPEAN SOCIALISM

The question is to know if the European peoples want to be free or if they will accept to live in the year 2000 in political and economical slavery. To master their own destiny, they must conquer their liberty, they must be the founders of a United Europe and a European STATE this implies :

  • A European Government, one sole legislative and executive Body. The United Government will be in charge of defense, foreign affairs, finance and large portions of the economy (nationalization will be required) and Justice.
  • The State will be organized in provinces and regions (economical criterium will be used to divide the regional competence) which will enjoy a large autonomy in economical management and cultural affairs.

European Socialism in order to protect economical independence and social justice presupposes the primacy of the policy over the economy. But, the unification of Europe remains over all a political problem and the Eurocrats of Brussels and Strasbourg have shown to the world the extent of their incompetence in the realization of the political unification of Europe. The creation of a political power is a prerequisite to any attempt of economical, political and social unification. The Common Market is the perfect illustration of that idea, exempt of any political substance it is merely a vehicle for the economical penetration of American goods and services in the European continent.
The liberation of Europe from the yoke of capitalism and the power of transnational trusts will be achieved thanks to European socialism but most of all thanks to the creation of A EUROPEAN STATE.

6.MEANS AND ONE ORGANIZATION : A UNITED EUROPEAN PARTY

The creation of a European State,  the liberation of the European Nation and the realization of the EUROPEAN COMMUNITARIANISM imply changes of such magnitude that in our project can be seen as a REVOLUTION EUROPEAN. The sole revolutionary agent capable of achieving these goals is the National-European Communitarian Party.
The National-European Communitarian Party (NCP-PCN), which is still in the making today, must place itself in a situation where it will be able to lead a continental action against the servants of US imperialism. We must therefore confront the European puppets who have chosen to betray the European Nation to further the interests of the  American ruling class. The National-European Communitarian Party is the AVANT-GARDE of the European liberation struggle and will tomorrow be the crossroad where the builder of the 21st century  will meet.

Advertisement

5 thoughts on “The National-European Communitarian Party (NCP-PCN) Political Manifesto

  1. Albino Squirrel,

    There are genuine reasons for even an American observer to be skeptical about the potential feasibility of a European State, a “United States of Europe.” How would a European State address the vast cultural and regional differences within the European countries themselves? How much political-economic autonomy will it afford to the European countries that have been relegated to the status of “States” or “Provinces?” What would prevent another country from following in the path of Brexit, regardless of which ideology it happens to be applying at the time?

    Those are just three simple, yet relevant questions on the topic of European Integration.

    But make no mistake: there are various movements, organizations, and parties of differing ideologies that would like to realize their own interpretations of a “United States of Europe.” NCP-PCN just happens to be one of them. I cannot honestly expect any one particular European movement, organization or party to spearhead such an initiative on its own. I believe that it would be far more tenable to expect various ideological persuasions coalescing around the endeavor because, despite their differences, they find Pan-Europeanism to be far more preferable than Euroscepticism.

    Signed,
    -DAH

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hello DAH,

      ill try to answer this from my knowledge and understanding of Jean Thiriart. Thiriart believes European integration meaning that cultures of Europe should intermix with one another. In one of his last interviews he states that believes the official language should be English or Spanish. I am assuming this would be accomplished by how European groups have been currently assimilating with one another due to the EU. I do not remember what Thiriart exactly stated on economic autonomy but if I remember correctly it would be based off of what resources does each state has and what could be successfully grown and produce there. I do not know what laws Thiriart or NCP-PCN would have in place to stop something like Brexit but their argument against that would be that smaller nations states like Britain fall more easily under the influence of larger nations due to these larger nations having more resources and population. Only through a United Europe in their opinion can allow Europe to have its own destiny and not be bossed around by the United States.

      Like

      1. Albino Squirrel,

        I figured as much. A lot of the ideas and proposals described in that manifesto were written pre-Brexit, back when Pan-Europeanism held more sway than Euroscepticism. While Pan-Europeanism and the idea of European Integration remain prevalent, I don’t think they are as influential as they were in the late 20th century.

        Of course, that is not to suggest that I am opposing the idea of a European hegemony that could serve as a counterweight to the US, Russia, China, and Japan. In fact, my most ideal world order would be a multipolar one involving those four and a fifth power centered in Europe. It aligns geopolitically with their positionings relative to the rest of the world on a map. I can understand why Thiriart and NCP-PCN believed that this fifth European power should be a “European Nation.”

        In fact, one of the great questions posed by the 20th century is deciding which European power should become that European hegemony. Some would argue that this European power should either be France, Germany or both as the two countries do have the geopolitical qualifications for that role. Then there are others who are in favor of a European Bloc or European Nation. Personally, I feel the most likely scenario is for some major European country to lead a European Bloc of countries on the world stage. Every nation in Europe is united on matters of Europe and are free to promote their national interests on the condition that it will further the overall long-term interests of Europe. The EU/NATO does not cater to those accommodations by design.

        It might seem like a tall order, given the complexities of a single European country, let alone its cities and rural municipalities, but I am inclined to believe that a “European Bloc” would still fulfill the fundamental goals of what made the idea of European Integration so attractive to begin with. Before any real plans for this “European Bloc” could be articulated, it is necessary to first envisage a new Theory of International Relations where it is possible to advocate for the theoretical principles of one. As the IR field stands, there is unfortunately no real Theory to promote that “European Bloc” and to justify its existence.

        Signed,
        -DAH

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Albino Squirrel,

    On a side note, if I did not mention to you earlier this week, then I will say here. Thank you so much for taking an interest in my Blog and sharing some of my articles on your Telegram channel. I appreciate that.

    I recently finished Part III of the latest “Thus Spoke Lenin” post where I talked about the State Capitalism of Lenin’s NEP based on concepts and methodologies derived from “The Work-Standard (2nd Ed.)” and “The Third Place (1st Ed.).”

    Right now, I am thinking about working on my next major multi-part post, which will be a new opportunity to showcase and promote the Work-Standard, its concepts, methodologies, intended functions, and applications.

    Signed,
    -DAH

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: